The 87th General Assembly
is in recess

Monday, November 19, 2007

Partisan primaries: Good or bad?

Partisan primaries: Good or bad?
Closed primaries: I like partisan primaries, and you ought to have to register with a party to vote in that party's primary. Independents can declare in the booth which ballot they want.
Open primaries: Declare which party's ballot you want in the voting booth, but you can't switch if there's a runoff. Keep it the way it is in Arkansas. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Cajun primary: If I support candidates from different parties in different races, I'd like to be able to vote for both of them in a primary.

view results
John Brummett's column this morning makes a good point about centrist politics and, at least to me, the way we elect our officials through the partisan primary system. I've always thought that primaries encourage candidates participating in them to play to their respective base. Once that candidate emerges from a heated primary, you'll normally see them switch gears and play to the center.

I'm pretty sure I already know what the results from this poll will look like, and I like the way we do it in Arkansas, but I wouldn't throw a fit if we held our elections the way Louisiana does. Yeah, they do just about everything different, but if you're looking for a system that discourages partisanship and encourages pragmatic populism, then they've got it right. There is no partisan primary there. You line up in a free-for-all election against all other candidates regardless of party affiliation, called a "blanket primary" or a "cajun primary." If you're not fortunate enough to garner 50% + 1, then the top two vote getters will face off in a runoff regardless of party.

That way, rather than debating evolution and spotting UFOs in the primary, you're forced to discuss real issues that will face real families. Even the most apolitical people I talk to about this like the current system, but it never fails that I'll get a call or two each election from someone upset that they couldn't vote in the sheriff's race using a Republican ballot, even though all four candidates were running as Democrats. Still, it would be a monumental change that would've featured seven people on the same ballot in 2006 for Lieutenant Governor. 27 states hold closed primaries, and 22 use the system we use (or one similar).

Previous polls:
Poll No. 7: Notification of MRSA infections
Poll No. 6: "No match" letters
Poll No. 5: Novelty lighters
Poll No. 4: 2007 Razorbacks
Poll No. 3: Governor Beebe's job performance
Poll No. 2: The severance tax
Poll No. 1: Flavored cigarettes


1 Comments:

At November 19, 2007 9:20 PM , Anonymous Cory said...

You know, Steve. There is some merit to it. As I am one of your Republican friends, I do have some misgivings about how our system works. You know as well as I do that there are a large number of Republicans that are elected as Democrats just because they know they have a better chance of getting elected as a Democrat. But the truth is, no matter how our primaries are conducted, it wouldn't change the fact that people still hide behind false identities in order to get elected. Of course, that's not the point of the system in LA, but one couldn't help but wonder if it doesn't open the doors up to more folks who might want to run that won't now. If they think they have just enough of a shot to bring the front runner under 50%, then it might encourage them to run where they might not otherwise.
As you know, parties serve a purpose. They unite resources behind one candidate that otherwise wouldn't have access to those resources. In a "cajun" type primary, you can win the election outright without the party structure helping you. It means that there may be some people that get elected that otherwise wouldn't have a shot. Jindal was a given, but I'm sure there are instances where an unlikely candidate won because he or she didn't have to face the vetting of the party. Like Arnold did in California during the recall. He probably wouldn't have survived a partisan primary.
I'm happy with our current system, but a closed primary does make it hard to vote if you vote Republican. Many contests are decided in the Democratic primary and I wish that I could vote in those races, but I'm faced with having to vote one ticket only. Maybe if there was a way to fix that problem, then I'd support it. I just don't know how it could be done.
And yes...I'd vote for you if I could. You're my favorite Democrat. Mainly because I know what a fine duckhunter you are.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home